Systematic Literature Review: The Role Of ICAO Standard Phraseology In The Prevention Of Aircraft Accidents And Incidents
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Aviation safety is significantly influenced by the effectiveness of communication between pilots and Air Traffic Controllers (ATC). One effort to minimize communication errors is the implementation of ICAO Standard Phraseology as an international communication standard in aviation operations. This study aims to analyze the role of ICAO Standard Phraseology in preventing aircraft accidents and incidents through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. The review process was conducted using the PRISMA method, including the identification, screening, evaluation, and synthesis of literature obtained from various academic databases. The results of the review of nine articles indicate that ICAO Standard Phraseology contributes to reducing communication ambiguity, suppressing human error, increasing situational awareness, and supporting more informed decision-making between pilots and ATC. However, the effectiveness of its implementation is still influenced by Aviation English skills, personnel experience, and adherence to communication procedures. Therefore, aviation communication training and evaluation need to be continuously improved to optimally support aviation safety.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Aline. (2023). Communication in the Oil and Gas Industry: contributions from Applied Linguistics and Aviation English. Letras de Hoje, 58(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2023.1.44471
Dani Chandra Yudho Pranoto, & Fajar Susanto. (2024). THE CHALLENGES IN LEARNING ICAO RADIOTELEPHONY: STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE. Jurnal Ilmiah Aviasi, 17(01), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.54147/langitbiru.v17i01
Delmio A.M.G de Sousa, Laila Rochmawati, Fatmawati", & Meita Maharani Sukma. (2025). DEVELOPMENT OF AN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL PHRASEOLOGY HANDBOOK TO IMPROVE AVIATION COMMUNICATION EFFECTIVENESS FOR CADETS AVIATION POLYTECHNIC OF SURABAYA.
Dumdumaya, Ma. T. (2025). A Systematic Review of Aviation English Communication in Emergency Situations. Journal of Education, Learning, and Management, 2(2), 1–343. https://doi.org/10.69739/jelm.v2i2.1207
Franciele Rodrigues Guarienti, & Fabrício Peixoto Ribeiro. (2026). A IMPORTÂNCIA DA FRASEOLOGIA AERONÁUTICA PADRONIZADA NA MITIGAÇÃO DE ACIDENTES AÉREOS. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5688-3901
Gabrielė MASIULIONIENĖ, & Gytė TUPČIAUSKAITĖ. (2023). BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN ICAO LEVEL 4 AND 5 IN AVIATION ENGLISH: EXPECTATIONS AND RESULTS. Aviation, 27(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2023.19763
Gharibnavaz, S. (2022). THE MOST COMMON ERRORS IN AVIATION ENGLISH COMMUNICATION.
Hazrati, A. (2024). Unstable Approaches: Exploring the Legal, Linguistic, and Sociocognitive Dimensions. In International Journal of Aviation Research Recommended Citation Hazrati, A (Vol. 16, Number 1).
Hilary S. Z. Wynne. (2025). The Psychological Reality of ESP Processing: Insights from Aviation English.
Markus Bieswanger, Elizabeth Mathews, & Enrique “Rick” Valdes. (2026). Supporting the Investigation of Language and Other Communication Factors.
M.G. Begimbayeva, T.A. Kulgildinova, & G.Z. Mussabekova. (2023). Features of the formation of aviation discourse of the future teachers of a foreign language. Bulletin of the Karaganda University Pedagogy Series, 110(2), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.31489/2023ped2/148-153
Ra’no Turaevna ERGASHOVA, Ra’no To‘rayevna ERGASHOVA, & ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ АВИАЦИОННОЙ ТЕРМИНОЛОГИИ: ИСТОРИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ Рано Тураевна ЭРГАШОВА. (2023). THE EVOLUTION OF AVIATION TERMINOLOGY: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS. Foreign Languages in Uzbekistan, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.36078/1696487642
Sawera Qureshi, Iftikhar Aslam Tayubi, Omar BaruKab, & Sher Afzal Khan. (2026). Enhancing aviation safety: An 80-year data- driven model for classification of aviation incident and accident. PLOS ONE, 21(5 May), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345956