The Role Of Periapical Radiography As A Clinical Guide In The Bypass Procedure Of A Fractured Endodontic File In The Root Canal Of Tooth 22: A Case Report

Agung Nugroho; Nilasary Rochmanita Suparno; Cahyani Cahyani; Aulia Salsabila Agata

doi:10.55227/ijhet.v5i2.1078

Authors

Agung Nugroho a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:95:"Dentist Professional Study Program, University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia ";}
Nilasary Rochmanita Suparno Department of Dental Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia
Cahyani Cahyani Department of Conservation of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia
Aulia Salsabila Agata Faculty of Dentistry, University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhet.v5i2.1078

Keywords:

Periapical Radiograph; Bypass; Fractured File; Root Canal; Tooth 22

Abstract

Instrument fracture is one of the most common procedural complications encountered in endodontic treatment, with an incidence ranging from 0.25% to 10%. A fractured file retained within the root canal may hinder adequate debridement and obturation, thereby significantly affecting the prognosis of treatment. Periapical radiography plays a crucial role as both a diagnostic modality and a clinical guide in the management of such cases. This case report describes the management of a fractured instrument in the root canal of tooth 22 (maxillary left lateral incisor) using a radiographically guided bypass technique. A 36-year-old male patient presented for continuation of root canal treatment on tooth 22; however, during intracanal medicament placement following canal preparation, the lentulo file fractured. Periapical radiographic examination confirmed the presence of a fractured instrument along the root canal accompanied by a periapical radiolucent lesion. A bypass technique was performed under periapical radiographic guidance at every stage of the procedure, including working length determination, instrument position confirmation, and post-obturation evaluation. Post-treatment radiographic assessment demonstrated hermetic obturation with improvement of the periapical radiolucency at the three-month follow-up. This case report emphasizes that periapical radiography serves as the primary clinical guide in bypass procedures for fractured endodontic instruments within the root canal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AAE.org. Broken instruments: clinical decision making algorithm [Internet]. American Association of Endodontists; 2020 [cited 2025 May]. Available from: https://www.aae.org/specialty/broken-instruments-clinical-decision-making-algorithm

Ajayi, D. M., Gbadebo, S. O., & Okeaya-Inneh, O. C. (2024). Evaluation of radiographic quality of root canal obturation performed by undergraduate and postgraduate clinical dental students in a Nigerian hospital. The Pan African Medical Journal, 47, 166.

Aminsobhani M, Nekoofar MH, Shokouhinejad N, Khoshkhounejad M, Mehrara R, Ghafari S. Broken instrument removal methods with a minireview of the literature. Case Rep Dent. 2024;2024:9665987. Doi:10.1155/2024/9665987

Antony, D. P., Thomas, T., & Nivedhitha, M. S. (2020). Two-dimensional periapical, panoramic radiography versus three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of periapical lesion after endodontic treatment: A systematic review. Cureus, 12(4), e7736.

Assiri H, Alshehri M, Alshahrani A, Alqahtani A. Assessment of incidence, management and contributory factors of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics post-graduate program: a retrospective clinical study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2024;27(1):21-27. Doi:10.4103/njcp.njcp_480_23

Bhalla, V. K., & Chockattu, S. J. (2021). Intracanal delivery of calcium hydroxide: A literature review. Saudi Endodontic Journal, 11(1), 1–6.

Castellucci A, Papaleoni M. Separation of nickel-titanium rotary and reciprocating instruments: a mini-review of clinical studies. G Ital Endod. 2018;32(2):45-52. doi:10.1016/j.gien.2018.01.001

Chai R, Jiang X, Ma R, Zhang Q, Yang E, Zhang A. Different strategies for treating intracanal fractured instruments in a single tooth: a case report. Exp Ther Med. 2024;28(5):411. doi:10.3892/etm.2024.12700

Gudac, J., Hellén-Halme, K., & Machiulskiene, V. (2021). Prognostic validity of the Periapical and Endodontic Status Scale for the radiographically assessed 2-year treatment outcomes in teeth with apical periodontitis: A prospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health, 21(1), 359.

Iqbal MK, Kohli MR, Kim JS. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in anendodontics graduate program: a Penn Endo database study. J Endod. 2006;32(11):1048-52. Doi:10.1016/j.joen.2006.06.008

Jain, P., Raza, H., & Ghosh, P. (2023). The limitations of periapical X-ray assessment in endodontic diagnosis: A systematic review. Diagnostics, 13(14), 2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142359

Lambrianidis T. Therapeutic options for the management of fractured instruments. JEndo. 2006;32(5):461-9.

Parolia, A., Messier, C., & Fabrizio, C. (2025). Effect of quality of radiographs taken during root canal treatment on technical quality of root canal fillings and endodontic outcome. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 50(1).

Patel S, Kanagasingam S, Patel S, Mannocci F. The role of imaging in endodontics. Br Dent J. 2025;238(7):e1-e10. doi:10.1038/s41415-025-8511-z

Plotino G, Giansiracusa Rubini A, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Analysis of endodontic successes and failures in the removal of fractured endodontic instruments during retreatment: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(13):3892. Doi:10.3390/jcm13133892

Radeva E, Uzunov T, Uzunov I, Uzunova P. Accuracy of periapical radiography and CBCT in endodontic evaluation. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:8263461. Doi:10.1155/2018/8263461

Siqueira JF, Rôças IN. Factors affecting the success and failure of endodontic treatment. Dent Clin North Am. 2022;66(3):337-58.

Solís-Soto, J. M., Palacios-Garza, C., & Abreu-Penate, M. (2023). Endodontic outcome of root canal treatment using different obturation techniques: A clinical study. Dentistry Journal, 11(9), 205.

Spili, P., Parashos, P., & Messer, H. H. (2005). The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. Journal of Endodontics, 31(12), 845–850

Suparno, NR, Faizah, A., & Zahra, HA (2024). Evaluasi Kualitas Radiograf Periapikal Teknik Bisektris: Kesalahan Penempatan Sudut Penyuaran dan Film. Jurnal Imejing Diagnostik (JImeD) , 10 (1), 1-9.

Torabinejad M, Fouad AF, Shabahang S. Fractured endodontic instrument: a clinical dilemma retrieve, bypass or entomb? J Endod. 2015;41(12):1989-97. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.036

Yadav S, Nawal RR, Talwar S. Nonsurgical management of a large periapical lesion following instrument retrieval from the apical third: a case report with a three-year follow-up. Cureus. 2022;14(5):e24995. Doi:10.7759/cureus.24995

Ye, S., Mao, T., Xu, Y., Hua, F., Worthington, H. V., & He, H. (2024). Electronic apex locators versus radiography for working length determination in permanent teeth: A systematic review. International Endodontic Journal, 57(10), 1345–1360.

Yousuf W, Khan M, Mehdi H. Endodontic procedural errors: frequency, type of error, and the most frequently treated tooth. Int J Dent. 2015;2015:673914. doi:10.1155/2015/673914