Optimization Of Antifoaming Agent Usage On Co2 Removal Unit Performance To Increase Product Co2 Purity
Main Article Content
Abstract
CO2 Removal units in the chemical fertilizer industry often experience foaming in the MDEA absorption-desorption process which reduces CO2 absorption efficiency. This study aims to optimize the concentration of PDMS-based antifoaming to minimize CO2 slip and maximize product CO2 purity through SCAFC identification. The experimental method was carried out on an industrial CO2 Removal unit with a population of four main equipment (Absorber, Stripper, HPFD, LPFD) and samples of varying antifoaming concentrations of 100-200 mL per 100 L of solvent. Measurement instruments include Collapse Time (CT) tester, CO2 analyzer, and laboratory tests, analyzed with a comparative multi-location injection approach. The results show the optimal SCAFC at 150 mL with the fastest CT of 12 seconds (Stripper/Absorber), minimum CO2 slip of 0.001%, and product CO2 purity of 99.45-99.50%. The conclusion of the study recommends 150 mL injection on low-pressure-high-temperature equipment for optimal operation of the fertilizer industry.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Alsheinat, E., Amr, M., Jumah, R., & Banat, F. (2015). Removal of MDEA foam creators using fraction foamation: Parametric study coupled with foam characterization. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 142, 90–98. https://khazna.ku.ac.ae/en/publications/removal-of-mdea-foam-creators-using-foam-fractionation-parametric/fingerprints/
Haziq, AR (2014). Foaming behavior of an aqueous solution of methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) and aqueous solution of piperazine (PZ) + methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) for the carbon dioxide removal [Undergraduate project, Universiti Malaysia Pahang]. UMPIR. http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9249/1/cd8529.pdf
Nisa, NIF, & Altway, A. (2019). Simulation of a CO2 stripping unit in an industrial-scale packed column under non-isothermal conditions. Journal of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, 14(1), 40–47. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/RKL/article/view/13547
Razali, AH (2014). Foaming behavior of an aqueous solution of methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) and aqueous solution of piperazine (PZ) + methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) for the carbon dioxide removal. University of Malaysia Pahang. http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9249/
Rosen, M. J., & Kunjappu, J. T. (2002). Surfactants and interfacial phenomena (3rd ed.). Wiley-Interscience.
Sánchez-Bautista, A., Palmero, E.M., Moya, A.J., & Gómez, E. (2021). Characterization of alkanolamine blends for carbon dioxide absorption. Corrosion and regeneration studies. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 66(10), 3785–3795. https://scholargps.com/scholars/76013178117573/alfredo-sanchez-bautista
Wang, M., Lawal, A., Stephenson, P., Sidders, J., & Ramshaw, C. (2011). Post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4(6), 1072–1093. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175058361000061X